Exploring User Interest in Ethical Tools for Nano-Risk Governance

Risk Governance of nanomaterials addresses multiple criteria including risk assessment and management, life cycle assessment and ecological, social and economic risk-benefit assessment. In addition, there is increasing interest in addressing ethical issues. To accommodate consideration of ethical issues, RiskGONE developed guidelines [1] and online tools for screening ethical impacts and performing a small-scale Ethical Impact Assessment (EIA) adapted from the corresponding CEN pre-standard.[2] Online tools developed in RiskGONE support users in performing the six-step EIA procedure (screening, drafting an EIA-plan, identifying and evaluating ethical issues, drafting remedial actions, and review of the EIA). During an online stakeholder workshop on 26-27 January 2021 of the EU-funded NMBP-13 projects (Gov4Nano, NanoRIGO and RiskGONE), the methodology was presented and discussed, resulting in feedback on expected users, applications of nanotechnology which call for assessment of ethical impacts and relevant ethical issues. This poster presents an analysis of the results of this stakeholder engagement.